Starshine Junkyard

Unimaginable treasures

4,255 notes

alwayslabellavita:

rousseau-danielle:

plebcomics:

i have yet to see a feminist/sjw make a decent rebuttal against this argument. 

pretty much

Sigh. Here’s your argument. 

Do you think this is the first time someone has slyly said, “Hey, how come we can say ‘Not all Muslims!’ and ‘Not all black people!’ but not ‘Not all men!’?”…? Are you seriously saying that this “flawless logic” has never been introduced before and has never been refuted before? You live a very sheltered life, my friend. 

I almost don’t want to do this. But I just can’t let it go. 

To start with, the people who generally introduce the “How come we can say ‘Not all Muslims’ and ‘Not all black people’ but we can’t do the same for men,” rhetoric tend to be privileged white guys. I’m not just pulling this out of thin air; this has been my personal experience with the dozens and dozens of people I have witnessed trying to use this argument. Of course, it doesn’t have to be a white guy who uses this argument. But it usually tends to be. So right away you have a red flag. 

Okay. Moving on. (I almost can’t believe I have to spell this out for you…) When people say “Not all Muslims!” and “Not all black people!” it’s in response to accusations that these two groups of people are all violent criminals, radicals, and thugs who are out to murder every innocent person out there and bring destruction upon society. Stereotypes about black people and Muslims—both generally very marginalized groups in the Western world (I assume we’re talking on a Western world scale here)—are not only statistically FALSE (here’s a nice little reference for you to look at; click on the stats and you’ll find their sources) but they actually get real life black people and Muslims arrested, beaten, and killed for no reason other than the fact that they’re black or Muslim (God save the black Muslim man; I shudder to think of what his fate is).

Let me restate this: people say “Not all Muslims!” and “Not all black people!” in response to FAULTY claims that all black people and all Muslims are violent thugs and murderous radicals. (Wanna know a secret? It’s actually white males who have committed the most violent crime and hate crime in the U.S. alone. Please reference the link I linked above for sources.) And not only are these claims false and highly defamatory, they spread anti-black sentiment and Islamophobia to the point where black people and Muslims can’t live in safety because people have these ideas about them. So OF COURSE people are going to say “Not all Muslims!” and “Not all black people!” so they can possibly try to educate someone and stop them from having bigoted thoughts about marginalized groups so that the people in those groups can live in safety. 

Moving on. I’d like to start off by saying that I’ve almost never seen a feminist saying “All men are rapists,” or whatever. I think most people are sensible enough to realize that, quite obviously, not all men are racists. But all men ARE part of a patriarchal structure in society that propels rape culture and devalues women. And even though not all men may be physical aggressors, all men are definitely complicit in these societal structures if they stay silent about them. And even though not all men may be violent and aggressors, ALL WOMEN can be victims. (I mean this in the literal and legal sense; victims of crime and misogyny. If a woman who has been affected in some way doesn’t want to personally see herself as a “victim” she definitely has the right to do so.)

Furthermore, unlike in the situations of black people and Muslims, statistics DO support the fact that a VERY LARGE AMOUNT OF MEN GLOBALLY rape, assault, and harm women. Not all men, of course, gotta throw that in there so you guys don’t get too uncomfortable, but ENOUGH MEN DO that we have a widespread GLOBAL issue with men harming women (and men harming men, to be completely honest; most of the violent crime men are victims of is also perpetrated by other men). Here is a thing you should probably read, and it also links to several sources.

Okay, but moving on. I’ve covered how, statistically speaking, men don’t actually have much of a leg to stand on. Obviously we know not every man in the world has assaulted and/or raped and/or murdered a woman but there are far too many men who have, and do, for this to simply be another faulty and defamatory accusation against men, the way accusations against black people and Muslims are.

(By the way, pointing out these statistics isn’t even accusing men of anything. You know how accusations against black people work? “I think all black people are thugs, so YOU”—*points to individual random black man on the street*—“must be a thug too!” And this, ladies and gents, is how little black boys and girls like Trayvon Martin get killed. This is how Muslim people get hurt, like that Muslim girl who had hot coffee thrown in her face by some angry white guy in McDonald’s this past September 11th. But pointing out these statistics to men? It’s not doing the same thing. It’s saying, “Hey, look at this, a wildly large amount of men do this, if you don’t do it that’s great, but staying silent is staying complicit so how about you openly call out the men that DO do this.”)

But okay. We’ve addressed that. What about the after-effect? Do any of these “accusations” against men have any sort of real effect on their safety…pay…job choices…lives…? 

Oh dear me, I think I hear the sound of crickets chirping. 

We don’t have an issue with society taking these (completely valid) points, topics, and statistics about male-on-female violence and crime—and then going out to attack men and hurt men for it. Men aren’t actually being affected in real life. I mean sure, maybe a woman was mean to a guy once because he opened the door for her at a store, but otherwise…are we seeing an epidemic of men being targeted in real life, harassed, hurt, killed, beaten, abused, fired from jobs, thrown in jail, etc, because of these “accusations” against them?

No. No, we are not. 

Now I’m going to make this slightly personal. You comparing women talking about their experiences where living life has become an actual nightmare (let me make this painfully clear: we don’t know if we’re going to be alive tomorrow, just because some guy might lose his mind and go on yet another slaughtering spree because he’s mad that women rejected him or something) to RACIST RHETORIC—rhetoric that completely IGNORES HIERARCHIES OF POWER AND PRIVILEGE IN PLACE to degrade and abuse people of color—shows that you have no understanding of privilege or power and how they work in systematic oppression. I’m so embarrassed for you because YOUR rhetoric is more similar to racist rhetoric if you’re ignoring the fact that the institutions are made up of men and therefore accusations against women actually do affect their health, safety, right to their own bodies, and livelihood…whereas accusations against men affect nothing but, again, their feelings. 

Which is something you even pointed out in your comic but “cleverly” (I guess) decided to try and negate with “But haha aren’t you using racist-similar rhetoric now?”

Haha, no we’re not. This was such a weak attempt. Please don’t try again. 

Oh, and it must be nice to live in your comic world where it’s the man getting harassed by the woman. Unfortunately, in the real world, it’s usually men who lose their temper when arguing with a woman. And then they kill the woman. But, you know, sure. 

(via fbisdanascully)

Filed under important long post

162,527 notes

idopaint-themgreen:

the-fury-of-a-time-lord:

lgbtqblogs:


Two brides have become two of the most kickass women in the world by marrying to protest against homophobia in Russia.
Alina Davis, a 23-year-old trans woman, and Allison Brooks, her 19-year-old partner, donned matching white floor-length bridal gowns and married at a civil registry office earlier this month.
As Davis is still legally regarded as male, the office had no choice but to hand them a marriage certificate.
The couple said officials chided them, and appeared to be violent.
‘She called us the shame of the family and said we need medical treatment … I was afraid my pussycat [an affectionate pet name in Russian] would beat the fuck out of her,’ Davis said on her VK page.
But the couple were allowed to sign the papers, meaning a gay couple in Russia are legally recognized as married – even if it’s through a loophole. ‘This is an important precedent for Russia,’ Davis said.
Russia banned same-sex marriage and outlawed ‘gay propaganda’ in 2013.


holy jesus look at these two warrior princesses
they are my heroes
YOU GO GIRLS

"Oh, you don’t wanna recognize my gender? Okay then lol guess you have to recognize my marriage"
that is amazing

idopaint-themgreen:

the-fury-of-a-time-lord:

lgbtqblogs:

Two brides have become two of the most kickass women in the world by marrying to protest against homophobia in Russia.

Alina Davis, a 23-year-old trans woman, and Allison Brooks, her 19-year-old partner, donned matching white floor-length bridal gowns and married at a civil registry office earlier this month.

As Davis is still legally regarded as male, the office had no choice but to hand them a marriage certificate.

The couple said officials chided them, and appeared to be violent.

‘She called us the shame of the family and said we need medical treatment … I was afraid my pussycat [an affectionate pet name in Russian] would beat the fuck out of her,’ Davis said on her VK page.

But the couple were allowed to sign the papers, meaning a gay couple in Russia are legally recognized as married – even if it’s through a loophole.

‘This is an important precedent for Russia,’ Davis said.

Russia banned same-sex marriage and outlawed ‘gay propaganda’ in 2013.

holy jesus look at these two warrior princesses

they are my heroes

YOU GO GIRLS

"Oh, you don’t wanna recognize my gender? Okay then lol guess you have to recognize my marriage"

that is amazing

(via toughtink)

Filed under amazing ladies sucks that they won't recognize both her marriage and gender at the same time but this is a really brave amazing thing to do russia lgbtqa transgender

22,194 notes

mocsow:

New York-based Japanese designer Nao Tamura has just presented a beautiful, new collection of dishes inspired by cherry leaves. Debuting at the last Salone Satellite, part of Milan’s furniture fair for up-and-comers, the silicone kitchenware is perfect for anyone who enjoys a bit of nature indoors. The dishes can be rolled up, used in the microwave or oven, and is dishwasher safe.

(Source: travelingcolors, via neon-banana)

162,504 notes

her-royal-punk-rockness:

official-cronusampora:

sevvey6:

colin-emrys-morgan:

I recently went to a con with some friends and you could see these posters all over the expo grounds. I think I speak for everyone when I say that this is a job well done. 

I disagree, I think costumes do equal consent. If a guy goes up to you while you’re wearing a Harley Quinn costume and makes you feel uncomfortable, you automatically have his consent to knock him right in the face with a hammer. I mean, he did willingly walk up to a kickass villain 

I GOT REALLY PISSED AT FIRST
AND THEN I KEPT READING

Oh thank goodness I thought shit was about to get real on this post

her-royal-punk-rockness:

official-cronusampora:

sevvey6:

colin-emrys-morgan:

I recently went to a con with some friends and you could see these posters all over the expo grounds. I think I speak for everyone when I say that this is a job well done. 

I disagree, I think costumes do equal consent. If a guy goes up to you while you’re wearing a Harley Quinn costume and makes you feel uncomfortable, you automatically have his consent to knock him right in the face with a hammer. I mean, he did willingly walk up to a kickass villain 

I GOT REALLY PISSED AT FIRST

AND THEN I KEPT READING

Oh thank goodness I thought shit was about to get real on this post

(Source: jaradpadahecki, via berry-muffin)

Filed under cosplay consent

224,752 notes

differentkev:

turntechstridercest:

jean-huh-kirschnickerdoodle:

doctorrivaille:

rapunzelie:

sb5ive:

rapunzelie:

new undies: cute stretchmarks: also cute

No no no and NO stretch marks are never cute!! wtf too lazy to go get some cocoa butter and use it daily? We all have stretch marks but we can get rid of it.. People should take care of themselves and if cocoa butter didnt work for you make an appointment for a laser stretch mark removal dont be a lazy ass

hey quick question: what’s your fuckin damage

all stretch marks are beautiful no exceptions 

stretch marks are perfectly fine and natural and beautiful, free lightning bolt tattoos yo
cocoa butter is a preventative that does not always work, and smells and stains clothes and oh yeah, since a lot of people get stretch marks just from growing NOT from weight, theyd have to slather their whole body and no one really wants to do that or smell like that so strongly.
laser treatment? really? you want people to pay $1000+/appt (usually takes a few treatments) to get rid of something perfectly natural because you’ve named yourself standard of the fucking world and think we all live to please you? most people dont have that money and if they do thats not what they want to spend it on.
also fuck you.

I usually don’t reblog ladies in undies, but for real. Don’t fuckin’ knock people over stretchmarks, or anything on their bodies for that matter. I’ve been underweight all my life and have them from growing. They happen. The just do. 

those thighs and the stretch marks unffffff

differentkev:

turntechstridercest:

jean-huh-kirschnickerdoodle:

doctorrivaille:

rapunzelie:

sb5ive:

rapunzelie:

new undies: cute
stretchmarks: also cute

No no no and NO stretch marks are never cute!! wtf too lazy to go get some cocoa butter and use it daily? We all have stretch marks but we can get rid of it.. People should take care of themselves and if cocoa butter didnt work for you make an appointment for a laser stretch mark removal dont be a lazy ass

hey quick question: what’s your fuckin damage

all stretch marks are beautiful no exceptions 

  1. stretch marks are perfectly fine and natural and beautiful, free lightning bolt tattoos yo
  2. cocoa butter is a preventative that does not always work, and smells and stains clothes and oh yeah, since a lot of people get stretch marks just from growing NOT from weight, theyd have to slather their whole body and no one really wants to do that or smell like that so strongly.
  3. laser treatment? really? you want people to pay $1000+/appt (usually takes a few treatments) to get rid of something perfectly natural because you’ve named yourself standard of the fucking world and think we all live to please you? most people dont have that money and if they do thats not what they want to spend it on.
  4. also fuck you.

I usually don’t reblog ladies in undies, but for real. Don’t fuckin’ knock people over stretchmarks, or anything on their bodies for that matter. I’ve been underweight all my life and have them from growing. They happen. The just do. 

those thighs and the stretch marks unffffff

(via lebestiole)

34,065 notes

sixpenceee:

HOW THE MOKIN CHILDREN ARE ABLE TO SEE WITH AMAZING CLARITY UNDERWATER

The Mokin are a group in Thailand that are nomadic and have a sea-based culture. 

In the sea there is less light, so usually one’s iris will dilate. But the Mokin have an adaption where instead of dilating, they constrict as much as possible. 

This allows them to see with much better clarity. Recent studies suggest that any child can quickly learn this trick. It exemplifies how well our brain adapts to our environment. 

SOURCE 

You may also like: SWIMMING BABIES

(via aorticinkwell)

Filed under Underwater thailand Mokin